District budget woes worsen

2009-12-24 / Front Page

$1.4 million loan creates confusion
BY JILL BALLINGER GAZETTE EDITOR

SUPERINTENDENT RANDY PANIETZ SUPERINTENDENT RANDY PANIETZ The Mariposa County Unified School District’s budget issues have taken a virtual 180 degree turn from where they were perceived to be just one month ago. In November, the district presented the unaudited actuals to the board.

At that time, MCUSD had an ending fund balance of $1.7 million in 2008-09, which represented an increase of nearly twice the projected amount. What a difference a month and state politics can make.

Last Thursday, Business Director Linda Levesque presented the district’s first interim budget report. Her news was not good, and some of it opened the proverbial can of worms into how the district’s financial details were being managed before Levesque came on board.

The first interim report is a representation of budget changes made between the adopted budget and Oct. 31 of each year. According to Levesque, the district has lost

877,826 in revenue limit funding.

There were significant losses in other state revenues, as well. At the end of the reporting period, Levesque shows that the district’s expenditures for the year are $19,617,980. Its revenue is $18,451,373. The difference is more than $1.1 million. That leaves the district with an ending fund balance in the red.

Levesque said the district is working on a “plan of action” to cut current year expenditures by $369,761. The board approved the interim report as “qualified” which means the district may not meet its financial obligations over the next three years.

“This is where we’re at right now,” Levesque said. “It’s what I refer to as being in the hole. We are in a very compromising position.” Levesque said the district should have certified the report as negative, but the current year spending cut plan will help it maintain qualified status. “We’re looking at areas that have the least amount of impact to students,” she said. ”We need to take care of this ASAP and start making reductions.”

To that end, Superintendent Randy Panietz issued a memo explaining the district’s immediate plan. He wrote to staff on Dec. 16 that “all funding that is not critical to keep the doors open is immediately frozen.” He also said that categorical programs are being looked at for further reductions, general fund accounts are being reviewed for reductions and that “plans are being developed for lay-off for the 2009-10 school year.” Federal stimulus funds are also being deployed to relieve any general fund expenditures possible, the superintendent said.

Levesque noted an important part of the general fund that had previously not been mentioned. She said the district had “drawn down” a TRAN (Tax Revenue Anticipation Note) loan for $995,152. She called the district’s cash flow status critical. “You have been floating on this money,” she said. “We’re surviving on property taxes. That’s significant,” she said.

The confusion over the TRAN began. The loan is actually a more complex form of a payday loan. The district can borrow from itself against revenue it anticipates in the future. There were far more questions than answers at the meeting, but the

GAZETTE has since learned more about the process.

During the meeting, Panietz said the TRAN money is “what has allowed us to pay salaries,” but then said “Nobody was aware” of how the money got to the general fund.

The board approved the TRAN on March 26, as a rather routine safeguard to have in place in case of a cash flow shortfall. Panietz signed the TRAN documents on June 16, and the money was wired to the Mariposa County Treasurer’s Office on July 6.

Levesque, who was not on the job at the time, was left a hand written note by former business consultant Hilda Miranda that indicates the matter needed her “immediate attention.” She said the turnover in the business office contributed to the problem. “There were so many hands in there, we can’t determine who drew down what.”

Panietz explained on Tuesday that his June 16 signature was only to transfer the money to the County treasury, where it would receive a higher interest rate. He said the County treasury was to use the TRAN funds for “investment purposes only.” That fact was not mentioned at Thursday’s meeting.

Panietz said last Thursday that he had “given very specific direction for this not to happen,” in terms of the money being placed in the general fund account. He did not say to whom that direction was given.

The superintendent said that David Marshall, the former business director, had authorized the TRAN, but wasn’t specific about the process. “At this point, we don’t know all the answers,” he said at the meeting.

Marshall had not been employed by the district for some time before the March 26 meeting during which the board authorized the TRAN.

On Tuesday, Panietz clarified that position. He said that in researching the issue, the district discovered e-mails directed to Marshall from the County in October, 2008, discussing a TRAN loan from the 2008-09 school year. That memo also discussed transfers from one school district fund to another, “which led us to believe that it had some relevance to the transfer of the TRAN proceeds,” Panietz said. “We have since determined that these e-mails do not have relevance to the current TRAN issue.”

In the end, the problem appears to be one of communication between the district, the company that issued the TRAN to the County and the County treasury itself. Panietz provided copies of emails that show the company should have provided the investment instructions to the County.

County Treasurer Keith Williams said it did not receive instructions until Friday, Dec. 18, after the issue came to light. The repayment accounts have now been established, and the TRAN funds will accrue interest effective July 6. The money to repay the TRAN “will be taken first from any unused TRAN funds,” Williams said in a release on Monday.

Panietz explained on Tuesday that he “had no indication that my written direction was not being followed by the County treasury.” He said it was the County’s responsibility to set up those repayment accounts. Williams said it is the responsibility of the school district.

Panietz said that the County is reporting that the TRAN funds have not been used, so repayment will not be a problem. The district is set to make its first payment in February, 2010, for roughly $556,000. The total amount of the TRAN loan was $1.4 million. The district received $995,152, and the County Office of Education got the balance.

IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO MAKE A COMMENT ON THIS STORY, OR READ OTHER COMMENTS, VISIT OUR WEB SITE AT WWW.MARIPOSAGAZETTE. COM

Return to top

Re; Mariposa Unified School

Re; Mariposa Unified School District / $1,400.000 TRAN Loan mess See Mariposa Gazette Dec. 24, 2009 for more detail Why do we continue paying 2 people big bucks to do the jobs they are obviously not qualified to handle properly? Superintendent Randy Panietz said he tried to handle this financial detail by uses of an E-Mail (the, this money to be used for investment only which might be lost is cyberspace) to the Mariposa County Treasurer’s office. No one in this office recalls receiving these E-Mailed instructions. On Dec. 18th they did received the instruction for investments only memo (I hope typed and signed)! The best guess is that there is a balance of $404,848.00 left. Keith Williams county auditor will now use the interest this money will yield to repay the $995,152.00 of the loan used, my guess it will take more years than I have left, at the best interest rate he can get, to recover it. Lets hope they do not have to use this balance to pay for any on going expenditures. Now Super Panietz said they have to quit spending money they do not have. Wow that sure shows how strong his leadership can be. Business Director Linda Levesque, it appears, did not know that this loan was being used to cover ongoing expenditures, because there were A LOT OF PEOPLE in the office doing things. In fact she reported a few weeks back that the district was in great financial condition. The now in the hole she talks about is $1,100,000, of which the TRAN loan covered $995,152. What happened to the $104,848 balance, was this covered by the real budget or more Voo Doo economics? She also plans on cutting some $369,761 from the $1,100,000. The school board approved the TRAN loan on March 26th with Super Panietz signing it on July 6. Then both feel to sleep as they thought their duties were competed. As I see it we should ask for the resignation of at lease these two as they have shown gross incompetence in handling there positions.

I'm surprised there wasn't

I'm surprised there wasn't anything about the TRAN loan in the Dec. 31st edition of the Gazette. I understand that the County Treasurer, Keith Williams, wrote a letter that was published in the Sierra Sun Times. As a loyal Gazette reader, I'd certainly like to know his side of the story. After all, Mr. Panietz has thrown him under the bus. Which elected offical should be considered for recall, the County Treasuer or the County School Superintendent?

Mr. Williams side of ths

Mr. Williams side of ths story will be told when all the facts of this issue are clear and verified.

I believe the situation can

I believe the situation can be summed up with the words from the classic 1967 film, Cool Hand Luke, "What we've got here is a failure to communicate." Now folks, let's get past the finger pointing and create a solution together.

"Now folks, let's get past

"Now folks, let's get past the finger pointing and create a solution together." Here, Here! Think forward.

Personally, we need a new

Personally, we need a new superintendent. I vote Randy Panitez out. He doesn't know what he's doing

Because Tran money is a lump

Because Tran money is a lump to be invested and the interest used to help cover costs. It is the interest Randy Panietz is refering to. Using a Tran is exceedingly common practice for school districts. He did not do anything out of the ordinary and the decision to obtain a Tran was done in the public eye. As long as the principle is not disturbed everything is fine. If Randy's instructions had been followed then this never would have happened.

It is still the

It is still the responsibility of the school to not overspend. It seems apparent that the school continued to spend without knowing how much of their cash was truly available; it is the school's responsibility to monitor their cash flow and know how much should be held in reserve to pay off the principal of the TRAN, not the County Treasurer. Blaming this overspending on the Treasurer is kind of like saying one's bank account is overspent, so, gee, it must be the fault of the bank. Or maybe the reasoning is that we had twenty checks in our checkbook so it must be okay to continue spending. Ha Ha

According to the County

According to the County treasurer, no instructions were sent to his office until Dec. 18, 2009, the day after Ms. Levesque brought the loan to light at the board meeting. How were interest payments made to the school district if the money was sitting there without instruction? Mr. Panietz needs a sign over his desk that says, "the buck stops here."

Why did Mr. Panietz first say

Why did Mr. Panietz first say that the TRAN loan is "what has allowed us to pay salaries," (from the above Gazette article) and then later say that the TRAN money had not been spent? Does the left hand know what the right hand is doing? It seems clear that we need new leadership at the MCUSD offices.

The reason everyone is

The reason everyone is confused it because we have a grossly incompetent superintendent who is more worried about reining in the teachers' union and nickels and dimes than educating our children. We have a business manager, and that is who is supposed to run the finances of the district. But since Mr. Panietz has gone through so many of them trying to find one who agrees with his misguided concepts (not that the current business manager does) and his constant meddling and twisting of figures, there are many of who doubt if the district really knows where it is. We need to dismiss this incapable superintendent and start from scratch.

I am very confused and

I am very confused and concerned. I have several questions: 1. The Gazette quoted Ms. Levesque, the MCUSD Business Manager as saying about the TRAN money at the December school board meeting,"You (the School District) have been floating on this money." In the same article, the Gazette reports that Mr. Panietz says that the funds have not yet been spent, so repaying them will not be difficult. Who is correct? Ms. Levesque or Mr. Panietz? Or did the Gazette artical confuse me? Was the money used or not? 2. No interest rates are mentioned. I would assume that the School District owes interest money on the loan. Will the interest that has accured cover the cost of the interest we must pay on the loan that our district supposedly never used? 3. How did we go from being more than a million in the black, as reported from the November 2009 MCUSD board meeting to being more than a million in the red by the December 2009 board meeting? In November you quoted Mr. Panietz as saying that he would use the extra money to reduce overcrowding in the classrooms and to reinstate progams, so he obviously thought our money situation was good. Now in December, inlight of Ms. Levesque's newest information, he plans to make drastic cuts. Who does Mr. Panietz think just fell off the turnip truck? 4. Our school district has had several Business Managers during Mr. Panietz's tenure, all highly touted when hired, all sent packing. I remember David Marshall, then the temporary team of Galen (I forget his last name) and Hilda Miranda, then Ms. Sanini, then Hilda again, then someone who lasted such a short time I forget the name, and now Ms. Levesque. Isn't six business managers, responsible for our children's money, in two and a half years a bright red flag? I'm deeply concerned.

This is more confusing than

This is more confusing than ever! We need this cleared up and the district employees, students and community members deserve a straightforward answer. It sounds like the superintendent is conviently using David Marshall as the fall guy since he's not here to defend himself. Surely the Board and Mr. Panietz knew about this before last week. What a mess! I consider this shameful!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.
Click here for digital edition
2009-12-24 digital edition